Two possible ocasions for the exodus and its implications

Authors

  • Ozeas C. Moura

Keywords:

Exodus, Date, Historicism, Biblical Critisism

Abstract

As for the two dates for the Exodus, about 1445 BC or 1250 BC, its known
that it’s a subject of much importance to define which is the most
accurate. The first date is lined to the biblical information. The second,
besides being against biblical information, especially relate in 1 Kings 6:1, is the
result of assumptions including elements of both the Israeli and Egyptian history.
Should biblical information about the Exodus be accepted or should we believe in
informations of other sources about the subject?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BOADT, L. Reading the Old Testament: na introduction. Mahwah: Paulist Press, 1984.

HARRISON, R. K. Old Testament times: a social, political, and cultural context. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2005.

NICHOL, F. D. (Ed.). The Seventh-day adventist bible commentary. Hagerstown: Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1976. v. 1.

______. The Seventh-day adventist bible commentary. Hagerstown: Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1976. v. 2.

______. The Seventh-day adventist bible commentary. Hagerstown: Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1976. v. 8.

PFEIFFER. C. F. Old Testament history. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1990.

RENDTORFF, R. The Old Testament: an introduction. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1991.

UNGER, M. F. Arqueologia do Velho Testamento. São Paulo: Editora Batista Regular, 2002.

Published

2012-11-21

How to Cite

MOURA, O. C. Two possible ocasions for the exodus and its implications. Kerygma, Engenheiro coelho (SP), v. 8, n. 2, p. 69–75, 2012. Disponível em: https://revistas.unasp.edu.br/kerygma/article/view/108. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos